top of page
Search
  • Pedro

A Comprehensive Comparison: Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) vs. SplitBrick

Real estate investment is a powerful way to grow wealth and secure financial stability. In recent times, two distinct approaches have gained traction: Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) and innovative platforms like SplitBrick. Both offer unique advantages and disadvantages for investors. In this blog post, we will explore the benefits of diversification, control, and low fees associated with SplitBrick compared to REITs, shedding light on how these models align with varying investment goals.


Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs): An Overview


REITs are essentially companies that own, operate, or finance real estate properties across different sectors like residential, commercial, healthcare, or office spaces. They enable investors to participate in real estate without the hassle of direct property management. REITs are typically publicly traded on stock exchanges, providing liquidity to investors. However, there are both pros and cons to consider when opting for this investment avenue.


Pros of REITs


1. Diversification: REITs offer a simple way to diversify investments across various property types and locations. This diversification helps mitigate risk by spreading investments across a broad range of real estate assets.


2. Professional Management: The dedicated management teams of REITs handle property acquisitions, operations, and maintenance, relieving individual investors from day-to-day management responsibilities.


3. Liquidity: REIT shares can be bought or sold on public stock exchanges, providing liquidity to investors who may need to convert their real estate holdings into cash quickly.


Cons of REITs


1. Administrative Expenses and Liquidity Premium: Investing in REITs involves administrative expenses that can range from 10-25% of profits, significantly impacting overall returns for investors. Additionally, due to their public trading nature, REITs are often overvalued, trading at an average of 10% above their net assets, with popular residential REITs trading at an astonishing 100% premium (in other words, for every $10 worth of REIT stock you purchase, you only acquire $5 worth of real estate). This liquidity premium increases the cost of investment, resulting in investors getting less real estate value for their money.


2. Limited Control: Investors have limited control over property selection and management decisions, as these are typically made by the REIT's management team.


3. Market Dependency: Publicly traded REITs are influenced by stock market fluctuations, potentially undermining the diversification benefits typically associated with real estate.


SplitBrick: A Paradigm Shift in Real Estate Investment


In contrast to REITs, SplitBrick presents a different approach to real estate investment, aiming to provide investors with greater control, lower fees, and efficient diversification.


1. Lower Fees and Effective Diversification: SplitBrick is able to provide superb diversification with low fees by strategically dividing the labor of bureaucracy and strategy between itself and its investors. Investors take on the role of CEO and strategy managers, overseeing the big picture and making crucial decisions. SplitBrick leverages its community of investors to bring deals to the table, engage in collaborative analysis, and vote to decide which properties to acquire next. By empowering investors in this manner and handling administrative and bureaucratic tasks such as LLC management, minutes, fees, banking, insurance, and tax preparation, SplitBrick can keep the fees remarkably low at just 5% of profits.


2. Investor Involvement and Control: SplitBrick encourages active involvement from investors, allowing them to participate in property decisions and analyses. This engagement empowers investors to steer their investment strategies while benefiting from SplitBrick's support in crucial operational aspects.


3. Customization and Control: Investors have the freedom to tailor their portfolios according to their preferences, allowing for a more hands-on approach to real estate investment.


Conclusion


In conclusion, both REITs and SplitBrick offer distinct advantages and disadvantages. REITs provide an established method for diversification in real estate, albeit with higher administrative costs, liquidity premium, and limited control. On the other hand, SplitBrick presents an innovative approach, offering lower fees, greater control, and the ability to customize a real estate portfolio to individual preferences, all while achieving a high level of diversification. The choice between the two ultimately depends on an investor's risk appetite, desired level of involvement, and specific investment goals. Regardless of the chosen approach, understanding the pros and cons is crucial for making informed and strategic real estate investment decisions.


22 views

Recent Posts

See All
bottom of page